WORLD HISTORY

How do we understand “tradition?” And what does it mean to change a tradition?  In some USA political challenges, change usually implies some form of break from a tradition. In the discussions on mass-mobilized societies, it has been argued that influencing the minds of groups, or mass-bodies of individuals removed from their traditions, i.e. homes, churches, farms, their familiar surroundings, such as sent off to war  -- increases the chance on influence for a change in tradition – usually in offering an alternative for tradition – a beginning of a new tradition. In USA politics, moving away from the United States of America tradition usually means race relations, such as ending the dominance of white Europeans for more diverse socio-political-economic groups at the high levels of society, and changing the “nationalism” of American protectionism for universal proliferation of ideas and technology. Yet, if the chastisement of humankind does indeed come about, what will move us away from our traditions. Would the judgment of the human race by global catastrophes therefore be a benefit to change? It has been argued that the Current president of the United States of America, based upon the color of his skin represents change. However, his policies are more of the same for far-left-wing policies – a remnant of Jimmy Carter’s. On the agenda, according to Barack H. Obama’s campaign promises were a national dialogue on race-relations. When confronted by this promise, and after Obama was well into his first year in office, he decided to break that promise. It is confusing as to why he has not and as well as a more telling of a leader who does not change things by his refusal to engage in this promise.

If diversity is the progression of human evolution upon planet Earth, then why have China, have Venezuela, have Spain, have England, and have Russia kept inserting pure-racial political rulers? Why not just elect multicultural cabinets, multicultural parliaments, multicultural senates, multicultural representatives, and make the Earth a cross-cultural circus? The Sophists would intend that race and culture are human constructs and that debating them will do little to reveal truth(s).

HEALTHCARE FAIL

HELLENISTIC NATIONAL HEALTHCARE DISCOURSE

The United States of America is comparably facing many issues in parallel of the period from Classical Greece, Athens;  specifically, where multiculturalism is concerned, Ancient Greek white-human government control (similar to white American history) comes into fashion with some democratizing universal social institutions. Here, Plato relates through on of his final dialogue masterpieces the choices of government controlled doctors ( slaves) and free market doctors ( Free humans) to their respected recipiants – the patients.

"Plato compares the lawgiver in Magnesia to a free doctor treating free people. Slave doctors who treat other slaves merely give them orders and then rush off to other patients. Free doctors treating free people must explain to their patients the condition they have and the rationale for treatment before prescribing (Laws 722B-723B). " ( Stanford, 'Plato on utopia,' First published Thu Dec 5, 2002; substantive revision Tue Dec 19, 2006.).

There is an eerie comparison to the role of the state as compared to the role of the free human. The state is there to save money, e.g. they treat people as animals – usher them in-and-out as quickly as they can as they have central government commands to make / save monies. All the people I have known who are from countries with free-healthcare claim that their system is broke, dismal, dangerous, uncaring, but free.

How's that Hopey Changey thing working out for yah?

U.S.A. Democrat Economics

        The Pelosi/ Obama Trickle Up Theory. 

Investigation of Medical Lies and Manipulation at Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin ( Live Action [dot] Org) [ Lisa Rose, 21 year-old U.C.L.A. student, and president of LiveAction.org ]

SpeedCam : Spy cameras all around the United Kingdom -photos.

Mesopotamian/Babylonian

Recently there has been translations of various other Mesopotamian/Babylonian grand-periods of astronomical texts/ omens which are mainly not repeated in the canonical Enüma Ann Enlil. While some analysis has been offered, no interpretation has yet been substantiated. Furthermore, only a fraction of the tablets known have been transliterated into English. Most likely, in a western civilization which used to fund graduates and scholars freely to work on whatever they desired, now approval for specific projects are more the normative. Transliterating Mesopotamian cuneiform omens are not high on the priority list. However, there is a call for a finishing of the transliterations and then a complete analysis can be achieved. I have done some work on late twentieth century astronomical alignment with analysis and came up short. Most of the computer software used in analysis was flawed and not standard NASA ephemerides. Therefore the analysis is subject to incorrect planetary data and this affects the overall analysis. There are some interesting correlations to words used in the sixteenth century Europe ( I’m concerned here with southern France at this time) and terms and ideas used in both the Mesopotamian colloquialisms and poetry used in southern France at this time. There were no cuneiform tablets nor glosses nor dictionaries – so traditions must have been handed down through the ages. Interesting, but I’m putting this into a book rather than giving it away free here. So you will have to wait.

K.11877 :  Jupiter Tablets....

6') J) MUL SAG.ME.GAR anal VIGIl? MUL Sal-i at-4-nu DU-iz E [ma KUR GAL-li-ma GALGA7 SUB-ut ERIN GAL il-lal-iaI]3°

transliteration: 6’ [If Jupiter] stands toward the front of Mars: [there will be] barley [in the land, the counsel7 will fall, a great army will be taken prisoner]  --trans., Erica Reiner .

Barak Hussein Obama  “Republicans are failures!”

  Sustained unemployment The U. S. A  2009 -2010.

  USA Summer of discontent 2009 Poli Sci.

Barak Hussein Obama  “Republicans are failures!” – the repeated 2008 campaign slogan rhetory – the idea was that Republicanism had its final death-blow – Obama and the Democrats would solve all the U.S.A. foreign  relationship problems and U.S.A. economic problems, proving once and for all that all the republican ideas of the past, of the present, and no longer of a future were abject and utter failures. The Obama and the Democratic Party’s arrogance reached its fever pitch on the coat-tails of George W. Bush, Jr.’s departure from office. Calling the republican party failures may have been the harshest accusations against a political party in any history. It is a stereotype, it is a general statement, and it was meant to hurt emotionally while not to hurt pedagogically. It caused a backlash creating the Tea-Party movement, it elevated Sarah Palin to national media star – note the focus on her and her family ad nausea by the left-wing media –an obsession verging on hysteria by the left-wingers in general – and the president's approval ratings at a level of the 80s in January of 2008 have dwindled to the lowest point so far in the 20s in early 2010 which is a record in the U.S.A. history and is a record for any U.S. sitting president for their first year in office.

Minuets after the confirmation of Obama’s general election victory, The New York Times revealed the entire political process of democracy when it splashed the reason why Obama was elected to the office of the United States of America – the color of his skin. This implied emphatically that there was no content of character or intelligence involved in the voting process. If the intelligence of a democracy run by the people judges a worthiness of an individual to lead a nation that is based upon the color of the skin of the body, then that democracy does not deserve to survive.  The individuals within that democracy do not have the intelligence to run a democracy. 02.23.2010 Archangel Michael.